10 comments on “THEY HAVE ALIBIS

  1. ” Each of us bears a responsibility to reject hate, whatever its form, whatever its justification.

    A soul filled with hate can devastate a community.
    A nation filled with hate can devastate a people.

    It must start and end with each of us. ”

    - George Takei

    Exactly as you say Rezinate – THEN and NOW- a huge difference in what is known and what has transpired in the ensuing decades… :D

    http://www.playingforchange.com/episodes/8

  2. JP-Some serious points and questions raised by LBW-but like others
    raised have been, and undoubtedly will continue to be studiously
    ignored-truth is all too often an unwelcome guest at the liars
    banquet, not only an embarrassment but a very real threat in the
    bargain, and clearly illustrates that the square pegs AIM has
    forcefully driven into round holes really don’t fit.

  3. SF
    The mere act of knowing isn’t enough-what is known must be faithfully
    acted upon-neither people nor their individual lives are pawns to be
    manipulated and moved about a chess board.

    • Well, fact about is that “knowing what responsibility is” turns ideas and words into direct action and hard work to make things happen- that’s what I mean.

      First and main responsibility is to STOP haters and hate disease spread by liberators and liars – in aftrmath WE ALL hate lies and being lied … when we succeed in that part , to stop it first – it will be avalanche of FORTUNATE events to start winning and regaining unity, solidarity, sovereignty :)

      And give financial, public and spiritual check mate …to opponents :D

      • SF-I understand and agree with your meaning- “peer pressure” to set the
        responsibility and understanding aside is far from a valid reason to do so.

  4. I go back to Part One-Wounded Knee of the Annie Mae timeline at NFIC. In the Editor’s Introduction it is noted that in the November 2000 CBC Fifth Estate special program, former FBI agent Norman Zegrossi says that Annie Mae was not working for the FBI as an informant. When asked how he knew, Zegrossi stated, “because he (the informant) was a friend of mine.”

    We can deduce, then, it seems that the informant was (is) male. I don’t know why Zegrossi uses the past tense to describe the friendship. Perhaps only to refer to the time period of the occupations.

    • Too obvious a point Mary, and the reason why it has been ignored. I think the past
      tense is a reference to the time period.
      In discussing this with others a lot of names have been floated, even Durham’s and
      Hill’s- with the “liberators” ranking higher than any other.
      Durham and Hill are no brainers, known, and too obvious-some say Trudell- but my
      belief is someone at the very top.
      They have the most to gain or lose-and they seem to have the greatest immunity.
      For these reasons and the way their welfare is linked to each other it makes the
      most sense to me.
      If a single one of them is an informant, to prosecute any makes it a near impossibility
      to not prosecute all, and in the process out the the informer, which would blow a
      lifetime spent crafting an image and tell a lot tales some might think better left untold.
      We may never know, or maybe it’s one of those things that will be released decades
      down the road.
      Could be I’m way off base as well-but something isn’t right in the midst of all this.

  5. Which takes me back to your post NOT EXACTLY SWEET LIKE SYRUP. And the comments there. I don’t think you are way off base at all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s