A prime example would be the murder of Jeanette Bisonette. She was shot while engaging in sexual activity in a parked car on land belonging to Dick Wilson’s brother.
The fatal shot was fired from Ted Lames AIM encampment and based on a yet another false and paranoid belief that she was a snitch in that she was providing information to the Goons.
Here again it is “warriors” murdering women-seems like if they felt compelled to shoot somebody it would have been her male companion doesn’t it? But then they have a history of indiscriminately targeting women don’t they?
On the day in which this occurred Peltier along with Dino Butler were in Lames camp, as were Annie and Nilak -the fact that Annie was there well could have added to the perceived liability AIM considered Annie to be-she may have known who the shooter at Lames was, and she for sure knew by Peltier’s own admission he was the shooter at Jumping Bull.
Of further interest is that for something like thirty years no one made a single inquiry about the status of any investigation related to Bisonette’s murder, which by any metric can only translate to everyone knew the responsibility lay with AIM-knew and in knowing of AIM’s other victims like Baby AIM, Anita Wilcox, Ray Robinson, Leo Wilcox, Rocky Duenas, Hobart Horse, Annie, and those unmarked graves at WK2 probably felt silence was the safest course to pursue.
But yeah-we ought to forget about such things and just listen to AIM mouthpieces like SB.
The murders at WK2 vary in calculated number from six to twelve-so for the sake of discussion we’ll say eight-exclude Ray from those listed above and add them to the equation and we have fourteen-then add Annie as a definite, and Nogeeshik as a highly probable and the number becomes sixteen. Add Williams and Coler and it becomes eighteen-leaving us to only guess at how many others.
What do the above victims have in common? Not a one shot by a fed, all AIM victims.
Eighteen and counting, and we’re supposed to forget all this and give these miserable SOBs a free pass? We’re supposed to say we should pursue others while mass murderers walk among us?
We’re supposed to say they are warriors, patriots, liberators, traditionalists, who belong to a “spiritually” based organization?
NOT IN THIS LIFETIME !
Deserves a reblog….
thank you LBW
Reblogged this on Looking Back Woman-Suzanne Dupree blog and commented:
So many murders, so few arrests or convictions…could this happen anywhere else but in South Dakota, murders of Native people…& no one in media even gives the corruption & hypocracy of the puppetmaster a second thought?
Why?
Want to talk about dishonest? Good, let’s do that.
Your comments in the vast majority don’t get approved
for reasons that are probably apparent to anyone who
has previously seen them.
They are neither factual, deal with what is known, or
for the most part even coherent.
You are an apologist irregardless of any issue involving
AIM, and you don’t merely post a link but find it necessary
to call anybody who crosses your mind whatever invictive
comes to mind- you add nothing to any discussion.
And in case it hasn’t dawned on you yet this blog isn’t about
excusing criminals or criminal behavior as you are so inclined
to do.
You transpose, juxtaposition, get confused, and fail to
“see” or “notice” what has been said-yet engage in the
absurdity of your comments in saying you have read something
on the other side of the pond, or you think something.
An example of “dishonesty” would be LPDOC’s and any AIM
site that promotes lies like the warrant for Jimmy Eagle
was about nothing more than an “old pair of boots”, or
the Mr.X lie that now even Peltier’s attorney says was
BS.
How about the fact that such sites won’t allow any dissenting
opinions, or the dishonesty of refusing to make public financial
records?
What of the dishonesty of Peltier’s lies about never shooting at
Williams and Coler compounded by another lie that he never
went to the car where they lay wounded, that he never even
saw them?
Not dishonest enough for you to speak about that? Then how about
your boy Russell’s career long lies regarding those donations
scams he ran for Yellow Thunder Camp and all the other bogus
“projects”?
How about his dishonesty of attempting to present himself as the
messiah of matriarchy with a history of pimping women and associating
himself with a pornographic magazine that exploits women?
Still not “dishonest” enough for you? Then does AIM’s denial that
Ray was even at WK2, or that maybe he was but he limped out
after being shot eating a candy bar qualify?
No? Then check out the link SF posted concerning the resmurs that
AIM says nothing was ever done about, that the feds killed everyone.
Do you find no dishonesty in the self promotion of Russell running
his mouth about sovereignty and then after assaulting a one armed
eighty old year old man saying the Dine haven’t the sovereign right
to hold him accountable?
Of course not-because this is the man you say you fantasized about
marrying when a young girl.
Is there no dishonesty in pimping the poverty of a people while he
and his AIM criminal cohorts live(d) in luxury?
Want to be honest enough to address if you got caught up in the scams
and made your own financial contributions? Oh, that’s right-you’ve already
said you aren’t interested in doing that. Gee, I wonder why?
Your understanding of dishonesty is about as distorted as the comments
you attempt to post.
But keep on believing you are a beacon of truth, AIM relies on manipulating
people like you, keep on complaining and grousing to yourself because you
won’t be doing it here.
Is isn’t as though you haven’t been informed of the reasons your comments
don’t make it through- one would think a person of average intelligence
would conclude if they had something they wanted to say they would do
that and forgo the rest of the b s-but I guess you got confused about
that as well.