I would qualify what I have to say by stating it is speculative and would be difficult to prove-that may change though as indictments are issued and someone begins to talk.
For some time now I have felt that among the AIM leadership there exists an inside man-someone who over a prolonged period of time funnelled just enough information to authorities to maintain a free hand and a level of tolerance.
Any who know me know that I don’t indulge in conspiracy theories-I have little willingness to entertain such things as fake lunar landings, the so called 911 truther movement, Oswald or any that.
That shouldn’t be taken to imply that I out of hand accept official explanations-only that I make the effort to research, think, and form an opinion based on that. No implication either that I am above being in error.
This however is a little different for me, and something I haven’t spoken much about-recently though I have seen another on a forum allude to this very thing and it strikes a sympathetic chord in me.
If you look at the history there is an apparent measure of Teflon associated with the AIM hierarchy-some seem to have an abundance of it while others do not and seem to prefer to keep a low profile-that could just as easily be guilt rather than Teflon though.
This suggested insider would be forever linked to his handlers and if it were revealed could create a lot of embarrassment and questions.
By now we know all the players-take a look, examine the history and determine for yourself if the possibility exists-who would be likely candidates and why? If there is a truth in this they have brilliantly and arrogantly hid in plain sight for decades.
A part of the “reasoning” for the murder of Annie Mae was the claim that people got busted around her. Let’s reverse that process and take a look at who has done what that you or I would have gone to jail for and yet they didn’t. Who is it that has always been the one who in the end remained above it all? Who at best only got the slap on the wrist, and why?
If further indictments ensue, some hint, some small clue, may be represented by who isn’t. This isn’t something that could be determined through freedom of information acts-rather someone stepping forward-even that would be a long shot I think as this most certainly would be a closely guarded secret that even a wife or husband may not be aware of.
As I say it is speculation, but one I think with a certain logic to it and something I will address again at a later time-in the meantime think about it.