12 comments on “TRUTH AS ” HATE SPEECH”

    • I’m fortunate in knowing people with the expertise capable
      of doing so that care more about the truth as I do than
      fairy tales, and a concerted effort aimed at multiple foi’s
      will be forthcoming.
      I guarantee that whenever Peltier passes on and his parole board
      and disciplinary records can be accessed they will.
      In the interim what is left is to play the redacted foi game and
      see what it produces.

  1. On auto pilot SB, deleted your comment – I recall the questions asked
    and more than willing to answer them – if you prefer post them again and
    then I will.

  2. Did my willingness to answer the questions you posed scare you?
    As I suggested submit them again and I’m more than willing to.
    As I also said I recall them – would you prefer I just go ahead and
    answer them?

  3. Here it is. I know I’m just a second class citizen here in contrast to the Ed Woods privilege package so I get automatic deletion where he gets unlimited posts with a side- bar endorsement:

    If after the ” FOIA” you find that the FBI themselves were more criminally involved then you believed that they were, how will you react? Will you call for FBI prosecutions? How will you respond to that ” Truth?” It might not fit so neatly into your ” anti- Aim,” agenda. Will you also be doing FOIA requests for the ones that were murdered by the GOONS during the ” Reign of Terror,” with the FBI’S intelligence, weapons and ammo? Or will you just be focusing on AIM’S so called crimes? What if you find out that Leonard really is innocent of shooting the agents? How would you react to that? How many ” handlers,” do you intend to expose? They are the real criminals in my opinion. Ask Mr. Ed.

    P.S- Good thing all my posts here are C+P and sent to Woods whether you post them or not

    • OH NO! NOW YOU’RE A VICTIM LIKE AIM.IF YOU EVER ACTUALLY STAYED ON POINT
      OR ANSWERED SO MUCH AS A SINGLE QUESTION IT MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT STORY.
      TO BEGIN WITH I HAVE CONTINUALLY SAID I WANT ANY AND ALL WITH ANY LEVEL
      OF COMPLICITY/GUILT HELD TO ACCOUNT – SOMETHING YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE
      TO BRING YOURSELF TO SAY.
      TO THAT END ANYTHING THE EFFORTS WILL PRODUCE WILL BE ADDRESSED IN THIS
      BLOG AND I ASSUME ELSEWHERE.
      IF FOR INSTANCE PROOF OF INNOCENCE FOR PELTIER AFTER COUNTLESS APPEALS
      AND WRITS THAT FAILED TO DO SO WERE TO BE THE WAY OF IT THEN NOT ONLY
      WOULD I ADVOCATE FOR HIM BUT A HEALTHY MONETARY RESTITUTION AS WELL.
      MY FOCUS UNLIKE YOURS HASN’T BEEN ATTEMPTING THE PLOY OF “MORE GUILTY”
      TO ISSUE A FREE PASS TO ANYONE.
      YOU FORGET I ONCE SUPPORTED PELTIER- THAT CHANGED WHEN IT BECAME
      EVIDENT YOU COULDN’T ASK A QUESTION OR A CONTEST A POINT IN THE
      INNOCENCE BS WITHOUT THE RESPONSE BEING SILENCE, EVASION, OR CALLING
      ANYONE WHO DID A SELLOUT OR FED,
      IT DIDN’T HELP EITHER THAT PELTIER ROUTINELY INDICTED HIMSELF WITH
      HIS OWN WORDS, THE PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, THE OUT OF CONTEXT
      CORRUPTION AND REVISION OF QUOTES, OR THE MANY LIES SUCH AS “OLD
      BOOTS, MR. X, MUTE LPDOC ” BALLISTICS EXPERTS”. AND INVASION MAPS.
      YOU CAN C/P WHATEVER YOU LIKE, DOESN’T MUCH MATTER TO ME ANYMORE THAN
      I ARCHIVE ALL THINGS I BELIEVE RELEVANT SHOULD TO YOU.
      EITHER WAY I BELIEVE A DENIAL OR APPROVAL OF SAID FOIS WILL SPEAK
      VOLUMES – SOMETHING ELSE I BELIEVE IS THAT WHEN PELTIER’S PAROLE
      BOARD AND DISCIPLINARY RECORDS CAN AND WILL BE ACCESSED IT’S ALL
      OVER, MY GUESS IS BOTH YOU AND ILPDC KNOW THAT AS WELL.
      NOW A LONE QUESTION FOR YOU, IT’S CALLED RECIPROCITY AND A LACK
      OF OBVIOUS EVASION – BY AIM’S AND YOUR VERY OWN STANDARD YOU
      BOTH APPLY TO OTHERS WHO “ASSIST” LAW ENFORCEMENT…. WAS RUSSELL
      MEANS A SNITCH?
      Sorry about the caps – shift key was stuck.

      • Twenty four hours or so later and still not an a reply to a lone question SB?
        You, like Peltier are your own worst enemy – you aren’t fooling or convincing
        anyone with the tact you take.
        Your silence speaks to the lies you foment and truths not a one of you has the
        courage to address.

  4. And who’s a ” fraud?” Where are the other 5 posts? SB gets 1 post out of 6. I’m not silent I’ve been “silenced.” There’s a difference.

    • On the contrary SB you’ve been silent for decades when it comes to
      the truth – a glaringly noticable “difference”, the end result is you
      lose access to any site that’s willing to address all of the issues
      and effectively muzzle yourself.
      Your other “comments”? None of which answered any questions? In the
      spam bin where they belong.
      So once again…..by the very standard of what constitutes a snitch you
      and AIM have used to define and label any who assist law enforcement
      related to AIM crimes does Russell Means qualify as a snitch?
      If so inclined a person might ask the follow up of how much and in what
      manner was he compensated?
      Knowing the difficulty you have in answering a single question I wouldn’t
      want to confuse you though by asking two, the first question will suffice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s