Well, the Hillary campaign is at it again attempting to smear Sanders related to additional debates – this time it’s about in part Sanders rejecting a debate date in New York on the night of an NCAA college basketball game in which Syracuse is a participant – that’s Syracuse as in Syracuse, NY which will probably garner a large television audience.
Kind of no brainer for the Sanders campaign to balk at such a date to my way of thinking, but a ploy favored by Clinton and the DNC to schedule debates on weekend nights when people will be out or during an event such as this.
Of course Clinton assumes the victim role announcing Sanders needs to stop playing games, and of course this goes hand in hand with her statements that Sanders is running a “negative campaign” and “lying” by addressing the issues of corporate funding the Clinton’s and their “foundation” are so noted for.
Maybe I’m in a minority demographic when it comes to things like corporate funding and ties to corporations as viable campaign issues open to discussion though I don’t believe so – maybe the majority believe Clinton’s lies and games are perfectly acceptable …… after all she is a Clinton and the precedent was established long ago.
Now, purely speculating I wonder if revelations forthcoming in the Panama Papers will reveal any secrets related to the Clinton’s, their cash cow “foundation”, or favored cronies?
I wouldn’t in the least bit be surprised, but as I say I’m speculating.
Hillary Clinton fully supported the FTA, or Free Trade Agreement with Panama -history suggests such support is usually predicated on the premise of personal gain, getting by with a little help from and for her friends.
Consider this, in supporting this “trade” agreement as Secretary of State the Deutsche Bank, perhaps the biggest beneficiary of many paid Hillary close to five hundred thousand dollars for a speaking engagement following her resignation of Secretary of State.
Mere coincidence? It might serve one and all to follow the money trail for all those speaking engagements and connect the dots between them, Clinton’s support, and ensuing legislation, deals, and trade agreements.
When it comes to the personal wealth of candidates among the current and those who dropped out the dominant two are Trump and Clinton by a wide margin, understood Trump is a one percenter but let’s drop the pretense that Clinton isn’t.
And then there’s that ongoing federal investigation the below link offers some hypotheticals about related to questions Clinton could be asked.