I could say a lot of things about that-but mostly I think Arlo’s and Graham’s conviction speak the loudest. I also think if and when Rios’ sealed confession is made public it has the potential to speak even louder and introduce in a more concrete fashion a new list of players.
Then there’s all those troublesome witnesses who have testified, and possible witnesses who have yet to speak. Even AIM members, upper and lower level, saying AIM was responsible for Annie Mae’s murder.
If there are further indictments I would anticipate another rollover somewhere along the line-someone saying to themselves enough and stepping forward.
When I first received this blog reply in They Just Make That Shit Up and replied to it there I thought it just another example of sick “internet humor”- it’s obviously fueled by a dislike of opinions I’ve expressed and myself as well, but goes beyond that that.
I understand there exists various factions and opinions about the murder of Annie Mae-lot of denial related to responsibility, and the ever present alibis and accusations, but to deny that Annie was murdered is beyond my understanding. Those who hold such opinions aren’t interested in such trivialities as evidence and testimony, an autopsy performed that reveals a bullet wound, logic and reason are not to be entertained either, and perhaps the correct emotion for those who entertain an opinion such as this one should be pity rather anger.
My initial thought was to assign it to the trash bin where it belongs, but in thinking about it I felt it was better to respond and post it-maybe in that it will serve as an illustration of the extremes that people will go to, and may shed a little light on what Annie Mae’s daughters have endured for decades.
The author of this statement weaves in and out of the Annie Mae fb memorial page, and while I haven’t seen a similar statement made there I have seen what I considered borderline innuendo.
I know for a fact that this individual has threatened “legal action” against at least one person who posts there-my advice to them would be since there is no legal basis maybe reasoned discussion should be considered. If that isn’t possible then they should take their own advice and stfu.